Frank Lampard is intensely mindful of the troubles he currently faces at Chelsea after West Ham left him frustrated. Chelsea are now three games without a win in all the competitions. Denied of the injured Tammy Abraham his side looked a sorry excuse for themselves, the youthful striker rapidly developing as this present group’s most imperative player, a confusing situation a couple of brief months back.

The England international, who might come back in time against Aston Villa on Wednesday, is an enormous presence in the final third. He has been scoring goals for fun. Abraham, as of now with 11 goals this season, has been substantially more than that, which means he has helped mask the insufficiencies of a conflicting assault. The Hammers left Lampard dumbfounded on the touchline, with Olivier Giroud corroded and incapable to repeat Abraham’s dynamic capacity to cut out openings for his quick partners in the wings.

“It’s not one player,” Lampard snapped when asked whether his side’s issues originated from Abraham’s nonattendance alone. “It’s the group. We didn’t do what’s needed in the last third. It’s been an account of the three games in the most recent week. Against Man City we got into the last third a great deal, however, didn’t do what’s needed. We had the decision to pass, cross or shot. It was comparative in Valencia. Today we didn’t do that very to such an extent, we should be increasingly innovative. My fundamental issue is we’re not changing over enough. Today we didn’t make very to such an extent.

Lampard is looking, however, with the pacey and tricky Callum Hudson-Odoi presented late on, prompting the analysis of Christian Pulisic as a bogus No 9, a choice the Blues manager could come back to in the weeks ahead.

“We’ll see,” Lampard commented. “He has got an ability to run behind the line and be sharp in central areas, which will normally get him more objectives. We’ll see moving forward.”

Chelsea’s attacking issues and the pressing idea of understanding them, given Jose Mourinho has separated the ideal response from Tottenham, to sit only six back, requires consideration somewhere else. The rise of Reece James offers more self-restraint in the last third from profound, particularly rather than the poor assistance from Willian late on against West Ham.

That should coordinate pleasantly with Hudson-Odoi, who gave a comparative danger from the contrary flank on Saturday. Cesar Azpilicueta’s essence and initiative are unquestionably key for Lampard, however, his attacking restrictions are similarly clear. However, neither Emerson or Marcos Alonso, two differentiating left-backs, are perfect for Lampard. The Italy international weaves his route conveniently down the flank yet needs infiltration when it genuinely matters, while the Spaniard has a cumbersome perspective when under lock and key, yet has demonstrated to be a genuine trump card when frantically scanning for a leap forward.

The impossible to miss angle to the full-backs throwing in crosses late on against West Ham was the little nearness of Pulisic in the case, further stressing Abraham’s significance during both Plan An and possibilities.

Lampard’s activity presently is to unravel the riddle satisfactorily before potential fortifications come in January should their boycott be lifted. There will be more weight now on Giroud and Pedro to spruce up a side unmistakably exhausted from the midweek outing to Valencia. A requesting Lampard nearly showed up irritated by the recommendation that an absence of match practice added to their failure to demonstrate unequivocally.

“I would prefer not to discuss coordinate wellness and sharpness since we train hard here,” Lampard demanded. “I get it, I was a player, when you’re not playing consistently, the requirement for games is enormous.

“Be that as it may, we must be prepared to attempt to come in. You shouldn’t seclude people who haven’t played, at that point you could discuss a player who has been playing each game and wasn’t exactly sharp. The reasons aren’t generally as basic as they appear.”